MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412715332 · doi:10.2196/64846

Impact of a 24-Week Mobile App–Based Human Coaching Program on Body Composition and Lipid Metabolism in Breast Cancer Survivors With Overweight or Obesity: Single-Arm Prospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4412715332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heejung Chae

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightBreast cancerPreprintMedicineObesityGerontologyProspective cohort studyCohortCoachingHealth coachingCancerPhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Overweight or obesity is a prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrence and breast cancer-related deaths. However, weight control is difficult for breast cancer survivors because of menopause, chemotherapy, antihormonal therapy, and psychological issues. Objective: This study aimed to develop a 24-week mobile app-based human coaching program using Noom and evaluate its efficacy in breast cancer survivors who are excessively overweight or with obesity, including those who successfully used the program. Methods: In this single-arm prospective cohort study, 130 breast cancer survivors with BMI ≥25 were enrolled and received a 24-week program, including diet-, exercise-, and psychology-based content with the trained human coach in Noom between 2019 and 2021. For a hyperactive group who joined for more than 16 weeks, we evaluated weight, BMI, lipid level, bioimpedance, and quality of life at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Results: Among 130 breast cancer survivors, 101 (77.7%) and 93 (71.5%) completed the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. The mean age of all participants was 54.90 (SD 7.42) years. At baseline, the median BMI was 27.14 (IQR 25.20-35.36) for the hyperactive group and 27.50 (IQR 25.20-35.50) for the active and inactive group. In the hyperactive group (68/101, 67%), body weight and BMI significantly reduced (mean difference -1.97, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.26 kg; P<.01 and mean difference -0.86, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.56; P<.01, respectively) at 6 months and were maintained at 12 months without the yo-yo effect. Among the lipid panel, triglyceride levels decreased significantly (-34.13, 95% CI -58.09 to-10.17; P<.01) and were maintained at 12 months. With respect to bioimpedance components, skeletal muscle mass (kg), body fat mass (kg), percent body fat (%), waist-to-hip ratio, and visceral fat area (cm2) improved in the first 6 months. However, waist-to-hip ratio and visceral fat area increased during the next 6 months. Based on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Breast Cancer Module (23 items), nausea or vomiting, constipation, body image, and arm and breast symptoms significantly improved during the first 6 months. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a 24-week mobile app-based human coaching program is beneficial for controlling body weight, BMI, triglyceride, and body composition in terms of bioimpedance for breast cancer survivors who are excessively overweight or have obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealthSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207