MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412719844 · doi:10.1021/acsestair.5c00107

Particulates and Gaseous Emission from the Indian Cropland Agricultural Sector and Health Burden Attributable to Emitted Primary PM<sub>2.5</sub>

2025· article· en· W4412719844 on OpenAlexafffund
Roshan Kumar Singh, Indra Mohan Nigam, Ran Zhao, Tarun Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Air · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsParticulatesAgricultureEnvironmental sciencePrimary (astronomy)Environmental chemistryEnvironmental healthGeographyChemistryMedicinePhysicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The agricultural sector significantly contributes to atmospheric pollution, impacting air quality through activities such as tillage, planting, fertilizer application, harvesting, crop residue burning, and grain handling. The outcome of this work is the documentation of the emission inventory of particulates (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ) and gaseous emissions (SO 2, CO, NO x, NH 3, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)) from the agricultural industry, particularly crop production. Further, the emissions of elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are part of particulate matter (PM), were calculated along with greenhouse gases (CO 2, CH 4, and N 2 O) coming from the agricultural sector for 2021, with projections for 2051. Total greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 were 408 Tg, while PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions were approximately 2.5 and 1.1 Tg, respectively. The health impact of primary agricultural PM 2.5 was quantified, revealing an estimated approximately 4 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 0.13 million deaths attributable to these emissions in 2021. The findings highlight the urgent need to reduce emissions at their source and ensure sustainable agricultural practices. This study provides critical data for policymakers to address air quality and health challenges. Furthermore, the developed emission inventory will serve as a valuable resource for researchers conducting air quality modeling and environmental impact assessments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS ES&T AirSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207