MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412720213 · doi:10.4103/pajo.pajo_109_24

Clinicopathological diagnosis of primary ocular amyloidosis

2025· article· en· W4412720213 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emma Youhnovska, Roxana Barin, Emily Marcotte, Katherine Jara, Miguel Noel Burnier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyloidosisMedicinePrimary (astronomy)DermatologyPathologyOphthalmologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: The pathogenesis of amyloidosis involves the deposition of misfolded protein, called amyloid, in various tissues. Amyloidosis can further be classified as primary, secondary, familial transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and wild-type ATTR amyloidosis. Congo red staining that becomes apple green by dichroism under polarized light confirms the diagnosis. When it affects the eyes, amyloidosis can target all the ocular adnexal tissues, most commonly the eyelid, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland. Amyloidosis of the conjunctiva manifests as a sessile salmon-patch irregularly shaped lesion favoring the bulbar conjunctiva. Orbital and eyelid amyloidosis is often clinically present as ptosis, proptosis, and diplopia. The aim of the study is to describe the clinicopathological features of periocular amyloidosis, and in particular conjunctival amyloidosis. Subjects and Methods: A total of 15 patients with ocular amyloidosis were studied at the MUHC McGill University Ocular Pathology and Translational Research Laboratory. Their demographic information and pathology reports were collected and analyzed. Results: Of 15 amyloidosis cases, 10 were primary (66.67%); 10 (66.67%) were conjunctival, 3 (20%) were in the eyelid, and 2 (13.33%) were lacrimal. Most patients were female with nine female cases and six male cases (ratio: 3:2). Of the cases where immunohistochemical information was available, all but two were diagnosed by Congo red special staining with Apple Green dichroism. Among conjunctival amyloidosis cases, 10 (100%) were primary, while all eyelid and lacrimal amyloidosis cases were secondary. Associated findings include fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and acanthosis. The clinical indication for the biopsy in 8 of the 15 cases (53.33%) was to rule out malignant processes, such as lymphoma, particularly for conjunctival lesions. Conclusions: Periocular amyloidosis can take on varied presentation, often mimicking other malignant pathologies including lymphoma. As such, the diagnosis requires clinicopathological correlation to be confirmed. The histopathological diagnosis is made with Congo red dichroism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pan-American Journal of OphthalmologySame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207