A Biodiversity Observation Network to support conservation action and mainstream knowledge in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada has begun an ambitious project to build an observing system to monitor the changing state of its biodiversity and ecosystems. A Canada-wide Biodiversity Observation Network (CAN BON) can support the measurement, mapping, and modelling of biodiversity change—the losses and gains in the diversity of plant, animal, and microbial life—and ecosystem services. This initiative responds to eight challenges presently constraining Canada's capacity to deliver timely and robust knowledge to achieve its biodiversity goals. CAN BON is conceived as a network connecting diverse organizations to support sustained biodiversity monitoring by collaboration among universities, museums, governments, industries, NGOs, community groups, and Indigenous organizations. This inclusive network will “mobilize monitoring data” to (1) combine observation and computing infrastructures and traditional knowledge to track and understand biodiversity losses and gains across the country; and (2) link the accumulated data and knowledge to models to inform the detection and attribution of biodiversity change needed to support biodiversity policy with forecasts from local to national levels. We expect that CAN BON will foster the mainstreaming of biodiversity data and knowledge into other sectors of the economy and society, and thereby support the technical and social innovation in Canada's transition to a nature-positive future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".