MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412722190 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3593299

Hierarchical Forwarding Resource Allocation With Proactive Frame Dropping for VR Video Streaming

2025· article· en· W4412722190 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Yang, Qingxuan Feng, Zhixuan Huang, Jiayin Chen, Ning Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkVideo streamingFrame (networking)Resource allocationReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a hierarchical forwarding resource allocation scheme with proactive frame dropping is proposed for multi-user virtual reality (VR) video streaming, aiming to enhance video quality in the presence of network congestion caused by multiple VR flows sharing a certain hop while considering the impact of network fluctuation. Firstly, we assess the queuing delay bound of frames, allowing bottleneck node to preemptively discard frames that are anticipated to expire. Secondly, we model the priority of different frames based on encoding referencing relationship and users' viewpoints, which helps to prioritize frames of each flow. Subsequently, we formulate an optimization problem to minimize the long-term quality loss caused by frame dropping, while adhering to per-flow quality assurance and total resource constraints. Considering the distinct timescales of network fluctuation and frame dropping, we propose a two-timescale hierarchical resource allocation scheme. On the long timescale, a resource allocation algorithm is designed based on queuing theory to calculate the resource demand of each flow. On the short timescale, to accommodate network fluctuations, a low-complexity heuristic algorithm is devised to adjust allocation results based on frame priority. Comprehensive simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in improving the quality of VR flow under diverse network conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207