MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412722439 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3593643

Cross-Modal Semantic Transmission Strategy for Mobile Scenarios

2025· article· en· W4412722439 on OpenAlexaff
Junqi Liao, Xin Wei, Liang Zhou, Weihua Zhuang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersQinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceModalTransmission (telecommunications)Mobile telephonyElectronic engineeringComputer networkTelecommunicationsMobile radioEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To fulfill the demands of emerging multi-modal services, the cross-modal semantic communication paradigm comes into being. It fully utilizes potential semantic correlations among modalities to address polysemy and ambiguity issues, enhancing transmission reliability. However, applying cross-modal semantic communication in resource-constrained mobile scenarios introduces new challenges, including radio spectrum bandwidth limitations and fluctuations for the transmitter, and computing resource constraints for the receiver, which leads to potential transmission failures. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a cross-modal semantic transmission strategy for mobile scenarios (MobileCMST). We first construct the framework for MobileCMST. Within this framework, a semantic encoder is designed to achieve redundancy elimination for visual and haptic signals. Then, a semantic delivery approach is developed to cope with bandwidth fluctuations and multipath fading channels. Finally, an efficient semantic decoder based on a visual-haptic semantic-integrated diffusion model is proposed. It employs the Mamba backbone to reconstruct high-quality signals with lightweight computational complexity. Extensive experiments demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed MobileCMST strategy in resource-constrained mobile scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207