A new model to quantify the probability of collision between birds and aircraft: applications for onboard lighting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally, bird and aircraft collisions are a major safety hazard and monetary expense for the aviation industry. Empirical evidence suggests that the behavioral response of the animal just prior to a collision is a critical factor in determining whether a collision occurs. However, no theoretical framework exists to predict the probability of a collision based on the escape response of the animal to an approaching vehicle. We adapted concepts from existing predator-prey theoretical frameworks to develop a novel model to quantify the outcome of an animal-vehicle interaction. Specifically, our model consists of two distinct phases. Phase one determines if a collision is even possible based on the amount of time the animal has available to clear the trajectory of the approaching vehicle. If the animal does not have enough time, then phase two of the model estimates the probability of collision based on the surface area of the vehicle given the location of the animal within the trajectory. We demonstrate the utility of the model by estimating the probability of collision between a Canada goose and an approaching Boeing-737 aircraft with the absence and presence of onboard lights of different wavelength, a technological intervention aimed at minimizing bird strikes. Our model predicts that when a Canada goose is within the trajectory of a Boeing-737, the average probability of collision is approximately 0.43; however, onboard lights with wavelengths tuned to the visual system of the species can reduce that probability on average by either 19% (red-light onboard) or 32% (blue-light onboard). The highest probability of collision occurred when the animal was in the center of the trajectory of the vehicle. The behaviors with the largest effect on reducing the probability of collision were an increase in flight-initiation distance and an increase in escape speed. Our approach provides a framework to quantitatively predict how the probability of collision might change across different species, vehicles, and situations, which could be used in forecasting the impacts of present and future transportation projects on wildlife populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".