MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412725090 · doi:10.1148/radiol.252119

Pediatric Safety of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: Evidence-based Reassurance and Remaining Questions

2025· editorial· en· W4412725090 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew D. F. McInnes, Ilya Abelev

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGadoliniumContrast (vision)RadiologyNuclear medicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Program and is on the LI-RADS IPD working group.His primary research interest is in diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests, with a focus on imaging of liver cancer.Dr Ilya Abelev is a postgraduate year 4 radiology resident specializing in diagnostic imaging, with research interests in MRI safety, particularly in pediatric and vulnerable populations.His clinical and academic pursuits aim to optimize patient safety in diagnostic imaging and improve radiologic practices and efficiency.Dr Abelev is involved in research and resident education initiatives within radiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0240.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207