MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412725206 · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c04182

Photocurrent Experiments as Probes and Prods in Large-Area Molecular Electronic Junctions

2025· review· en· W4412725206 on OpenAlexafffund
Abhishek S. Shekhawat, Aarti Diwan, Tulika Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar, Shailendra K. Saxena, Richard L. McCreery

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, University Grants CommissionFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of AlbertaSRM Institute of Science and Technology
KeywordsQuantum tunnellingChemistryMolecular electronicsPhotocurrentNanotechnologyMolecular wireChemical physicsCharge (physics)QuantumMolecular dynamicsMoleculeOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhysicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its experimental realization in the late 1990s, molecular electronics (ME) has received significant attention due to its unique charge transport behavior that occurs over nanoscale dimensions. The molecular junction (MJ), wherein single molecules or arrays of parallel molecules are oriented between two metallic electrodes is the fundamental building block of ME. Specifically, temperature-independent quantum mechanical tunneling across a few nanometers in MJs is distinct from transport in organic or inorganic semiconductors and may be valuable for next-generation electronics. Although molecular tunneling junctions have been introduced commercially, fundamental questions remain about the control of charge transport in various MJs, including those containing proteins and DNA. Examples include: (i) Does molecular structure play an important role in charge transport? (ii) What is the effective barrier (tunneling or any other) for transport in MJs? (iii) Does the molecular structure remain intact during junction fabrication and operation? (iv) What charge transport mechanisms are present beyond the range of quantum tunneling? We propose a simple yet effective approach to resolve the important questions mentioned above through photocurrent experiments. In this perspective, we are showcasing various capabilities of photocurrent experiments to probe, prod, and investigate various features in MEs including internal energy barriers, in situ monitoring of the molecular structure, activationless transport over long distances, and biological charge transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207