MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412727506 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15141808

Exploration of 3D Few-Shot Learning Techniques for Classification of Knee Joint Injuries on MR Images

2025· article· en· W4412727506 on OpenAlexaff
Vinh Hiep Dang, Minh Tri Nguyen, Le Ngoc Hoang, Thuan T. Nguyen, Quoc‐Viet Tran, Tan Peck Ha, Vu Pham Thao Vy, Truong Nguyen Khanh Hung, Ching‐Yu Lee, Ching‐Li Tseng, Phung‐Anh Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersTaipei Medical University
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceDiscriminative modelMachine learningComputer scienceMagnetic resonance imagingKnee JointMedical imagingDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate diagnosis of knee joint injuries from magnetic resonance (MR) images is critical for patient care. Background/Objectives: While deep learning has advanced 3D MR image analysis, its reliance on extensive labeled datasets is a major hurdle for diverse knee pathologies. Few-shot learning (FSL) addresses this by enabling models to classify new conditions from minimal annotated examples, often leveraging knowledge from related tasks. However, creating robust 3D FSL frameworks for varied knee injuries remains challenging. Methods: We introduce MedNet-FS, a 3D FSL framework that effectively classifies knee injuries by utilizing domain-specific pre-trained weights and generalized end-to-end (GE2E) loss for discriminative embeddings. Results: MedNet-FS, with knee-MRI-specific pre-training, significantly outperformed models using generic or other medical pre-trained weights and approached supervised learning performance on internal datasets with limited samples (e.g., achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 for ACL tear classification with k = 40 support samples on the MRNet dataset). External validation on the KneeMRI dataset revealed challenges in classifying partially torn ACL (AUC up to 0.58) but demonstrated promising performance for distinguishing intact versus fully ruptured ACLs (AUC 0.62 with k = 40). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that tailored FSL strategies can substantially reduce data dependency in developing specialized medical imaging tools. This approach fosters rapid AI tool development for knee injuries and offers a scalable solution for data scarcity in other medical imaging domains, potentially democratizing AI-assisted diagnostics, particularly for rare conditions or in resource-limited settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207