MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412727777 · doi:10.1038/s44294-025-00093-9

Developing point-of-care tools to inform decisions regarding prescription medication use in pregnancy

2025· article· en· W4412727777 on OpenAlexafffund
Animesh Kumar Paul, Sunil V. Kalmady, Russell Greiner, Padma Kaul

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Women s Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreNorthern Alberta Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaAlberta InnovatesAlberta Machine Intelligence InstituteCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsObservational studyMedicinePregnancyMedical prescriptionRandomized controlled trialPopulationMEDLINEHealth careCohort studyIntensive care medicineFamily medicineMedical emergencyNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pregnant women are often excluded from randomized clinical trials due to safety concerns, yet the increasing prevalence of pre-existing conditions and pregnancy complications necessitates medication use. Observational cohort data can provide valuable insights to support clinical decision-making. We developed a web-based tool that presents population-level data on medication use and preterm birth risk. By integrating real-world evidence, this tool helps clinicians assess medication-related outcomes and improve maternal and neonatal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.155
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.155
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Women s HealthSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207