MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412732533 · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11291-x

Cuckoo catfish optimizer: a new meta-heuristic optimization algorithm

2025· article· en· W4412732533 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta heuristicComputer scienceCuckooCuckoo searchCatfishHeuristicOptimization algorithmMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMetaheuristicArtificial intelligenceFish <Actinopterygii>MathematicsFisheryBiologyZoologyParticle swarm optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new meta-heuristic algorithm, Cuckoo Catfish Optimizer (CCO), is proposed for numerical optimization problems. It simulates the search, predation, and parasitic behavior observed in cichlids. Early iterations of the algorithm focus on executing a multidimensional enveloping search strategy and a compressed space strategy, combined with an auxiliary search strategy to efectively limit the escape space of cichlids. This phase ensures extensive exploration of the solution space. In the intermediate stage of iteration, the algorithm uses a transition strategy to promote a smooth transition from exploration to exploitation, endowing the algorithm with both a certain degree of exploration capability and exploitation capability. In later stages, the algorithm uses chaotic predation mechanisms to create disturbances around cichlids to improve the exploitation of optimal solutions. Throughout the entire optimization process, the guidance, parasitism, and death mechanisms of individuals are integrated, allowing individuals to adjust their positions in real-time and improve the overall convergence accuracy. This paper rigorously evaluates the performance of CCO through 23 classic test functions and three CEC test suites. The experimental results show that compared with 11 famous algorithms and 10 novel improved algorithms, CCO can obtain the optimal solution in 91.52% of the test functions, demonstrating its excellent ability in solving various numerical optimization problems. Additionally, through the successful application to 6 mechanical optimization problems, 3 photovoltaic cell parameter optimization problems, and 1 path opti- mization problem, the competitiveness of CCO in solving real-world problems is verified and highlighted. The CCO source code can be downloaded here: https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/fileexchange/176828-cuckoo-catfish-optimizer-a-new-meta-heuristic-optimization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it