Flood Risk Management (Studi Kasus: Sungai Bahodopi, Di Kecamatan Bahodopi, Kabupaten Morowali)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari studi ini adalah untuk mendapatkan gambaran tentang pengaruh metode Soil Bioengineering dan pendekatan non-struktual terhadap peningkatan Flood Risk Management. Metode penulisan berdasarkan studi literatur dan studi preseden yang menjelaskan berbagai sumber yang berkaitan dengan penerapan Soil Bioengineering sebagai elemen Green Infrastructure dan pendekatan non-struktural untuk menanggulangi bencana banjir akbiat aktivitas industri dan permukiman penduduk di sekitar bantaran sungai. Karakteristik vegetasi akar dalam dan batang kokoh diharapkan dapat menanggulangi terjadinya bencana banjir ke dalam areal permukiman penduduk, dan pendekatan non-struktural juga dapat diterapkan, seperti pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Sungai Bahodopi, yaitu peraturan tata guna lahan dan beberapa aturan mengenai larangan penggunaan tanah disekitar riparian sungai yang berpotensi mengurangi daerah resapan air dan menyebabkan terjadinya bencana banjir. Dengan demikian penerapan Flood Risk Management yang direncanakan dapat mengatasi bencana banjir di areal permukiman padat penduduk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".