MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412733978 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1602485

Following a half-century oceanographic data gap in the northern Canadian Arctic Archipelago: multidecadal variability of the Pacific water throughflow

2025· article· en· W4412733978 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Igor Dmitrenko, Sergei Kirillov, David G. Babb, Tonya Burgers, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Dorthe Dahl‐Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsThroughflowArchipelagoOceanographyArcticClimatologyThe arcticGeologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) serves as a major conduit between the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic. The Nansen Sound fiord system, which encapsulates Nansen Sound, Greely Fiord, Eureka Sound and several surrounding fiords, forms the northernmost oceanographic passageway through the CAA. Due to hostile ice conditions, the area has been understudied since the original oceanographic surveys were conducted in the 1960s and 1970s. The historic data highlighted a very weak signal of the relatively fresh Pacific-derived water (PW). Here, we present new oceanographic observations, including PW tracers, and contrast them against the historic data. Salinity profiles taken in 2024 show significant freshening as compared to 1976. This freshening is attributed to enhanced presence of PW in the area. We suggest that changes in the Arctic Oscillation impact the export gateways of PW from the Arctic Ocean, with the recent switch to a positive phase enhancing the outflow of cool and less saline PW through the CAA. Overall, this provides a first glimpse into variability of the freshwater flow through the straits of the northern CAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207