The Connection of Gravity, Dark Matter, and Supermassive Black Holes via a Set of Particles Associated With Gravity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gravity by far is the weakest force in the Universe and this weakness is not described by the Standard Model. Currently there is no known theory explaining why gravity is so weak or so different from other forces. This paper proposes a solution for this feebleness. In solving the gravity weakness problem, it was found that other unknowns in cosmology find possible answers. It is known that particles are found as groups or as families with special group behaviors. Additionally, not all families of particles interact by all the fundamental forces. For example, neutrals do not interact by the "charge force." This behavior presents the possibility that a special relationship may exist between a specific family of particles and a specific associated force for that family. Such a relationship is believed to have been found and presented in this work. This work finds the coupling constant of strength of a fundamental force and what is an associated family of states for that specific force. This finding has been tested and verified with the known families of particles and forces. This relationship is then used to determine and calculate the parameters of a proposed set of states associated with the force of gravity. The result of this association makes it clear why gravity is different and measured so weak. This hypothesis also provides an explanation why fundamental forces and particles are so related and predicts the possibility of a fifth force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".