MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412735333 · doi:10.14740/cr2030

Adverse Cardiovascular Events Are Infrequent but Significantly Associated With Systolic and Pre-Systolic Hypertension: An Occupational Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4412735333 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, Fiorella E. Zuzunaga-Montoya, Luisa Erika Milagros Vásquez-Romero, Joan A. Loayza-Castro, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval, Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Witre Omar Padilla, Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineIsolated systolic hypertensionCohortBlood pressureSystolic hypertensionAdverse effectSystoleDiastole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global mortality. Different blood pressure subtypes may have varying associations with cardiovascular events, but evidence remains inconclusive in the working population. The objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence and differences between hypertension and prehypertension subtypes in the development of cardiovascular events in an occupational cohort. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including 12,027 workers monitored over 8 years. The outcome variable was the development of CVD, including myocardial infarction and/or stroke. Hypertension subtypes were classified as normotension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mm Hg), isolated systolic hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg), isolated diastolic hypertension (SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg), and systolic-diastolic hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg). Prehypertension subtypes were defined as isolated systolic prehypertension (SBP 120 - 139 mm Hg and DBP < 80 mm Hg), isolated diastolic prehypertension (SBP < 120 mm Hg and DBP 80 - 89 mm Hg), and systolic-diastolic prehypertension (SBP 120 - 139 mm Hg and DBP 80 - 89 mm Hg). Cox models were used to estimate crude hazard ratios (cHRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), controlling for sociodemographic variables and cardiovascular risk factors. Results: Isolated systolic hypertension (aHR: 6.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.10 - 14.8) and isolated systolic prehypertension (aHR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.73 - 6.74) showed significant associations with cardiovascular events, even after adjusting for confounding variables. Neither isolated diastolic nor systolic-diastolic prehypertension and hypertension showed significant associations. Conclusions: While cardiovascular events were infrequent in this occupational cohort, those that occurred showed significant associations with both systolic hypertension and pre-systolic hypertension, suggesting the importance of systolic pressure monitoring in workplace health surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology ResearchSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207