Research progress on the poisoning behavior of air electrodes and corresponding protection strategies for protonic ceramic cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As next-generation intermediate-temperature electrochemical energy conversion devices, protonic ceramic cells (PCCs) face significant challenges in durability and commercialization due to air electrode poisoning under complex operating conditions. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent progress in the study of the poisoning of the air electrodes, focusing on the individual and synergistic mechanisms of various contaminants, including Cr species, CO 2 , high-temperature steam, and sulfides. The review also discusses strategies for improving the poisoning tolerance of air electrodes, such as doping, developing composite and high-entropy materials, surface modification and structural optimization. In addition, it highlights the application of advanced characterization techniques for elucidating poisoning processes and investigates the structure–function relationships between poisoning mechanisms and material design. Future research directions are identified to guide ongoing development. Overall, this review offers theoretical insights and technical guidance to advance high-performance, long-life air electrodes for PCCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it