MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412737985 · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230863

Rethinking the 1946 Chatkal earthquake: Contributions of Pléiades and UAV images to a surface-rupturing event along the Talas-Fergana Fault

2025· article· en· W4412737985 on OpenAlexaff
Magali Rizza, Léa Pousse‐Beltran, Jules Fleury, Sultan Baikulov, Kanatbek Abdrakhmatov

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversConseil National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAix-Marseille UniversitéFondation Aix-Marseille UniversiteCentre national d'études spatiales
KeywordsGeologySeismologyFault (geology)Surface ruptureEvent (particle physics)Intraplate earthquakeTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study re-evaluates the paleoseismicity and seismic hazard of the northern Talas-Fergana Fault (TFF), a major strike-slip fault in Central Asia, through geomorphic and paleoseismic investigations in the Chatkal Range. Although active during the late Holocene, the TFF's seismic behavior remains poorly understood. No major earthquakes have been definitively linked to it in instrumental or historical records, and paleoseismic data are scarce. The most significant regional event, the Ms 7.5 Chatkal earthquake of November 2, 1946, generated intense ground shaking, despite its epicenter being located approximately 20 to 70 km away from the Talas-Fergana Fault (TFF). Yet, no clear surface rupture or fresh tectonic scarps have been documented nearby, fueling ongoing debate over the fault source, location, and relation to the TFF. To resolve these uncertainties, we integrate remote sensing, high-resolution topographic analysis, field mapping, and trenching to identify and characterize surface faulting along the TFF. Satellite and drone imagery reveal a well-preserved rupture zone extending 32–55 km, with horizontal displacements of 4.8–6.5 m, values consistent with an earthquake of Mw 6.9–7.3, aligning well with the 1946 event. Trenching results indicate at least three surface-rupturing earthquakes over the past 6500 years and dating of a displaced alluvial fan yields slip rate of 0.9–1.8 mm/yr—substantially lower than values reported further south. These findings confirm that the TFF is capable of generating significant earthquakes. A key finding is that the 1946 rupture may have initiated on a subsidiary ENE-trending thrust fault before propagating onto the TFF—a slip-partitioned rupture model that reconciles surface rupture observations with relocated epicenters and mirrors behavior seen in other complex strike-slip fault systems. Our results point to segmented rupture patterns and the potential for Mw 6.5–7.5 earthquakes along the northern TFF, underscoring its importance for seismic hazard assessments in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonophysicsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207