MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412740265 · doi:10.1002/mawe.1750

Study of the uniaxial behavior of isotropic ice in relation to time‐dependent and time‐independent strains

2025· article· en· W4412740265 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdiyeh Seifaddini, G. Aryanpour, Ali Saeidi, M. Farzaneh

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepMaterials scienceStrain (injury)IsotropyComposite materialPlasticityCrystalliteCompression (physics)MetallurgyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing studies that assess ice strain behavior do not consider the presence of a permanent inelastic strain that is independent of time, such as is observed in other materials. To investigate permanent inelastic strain and to determine the other strain components for ice, we performed creep tests on polycrystalline isotropic ice under a constant uniaxial compression load at several loading and unloading times and temperatures of ‐5 °C, ‐10 °C, and ‐15 °C. Plastic strain decreases as temperature decreases. However, relative to other strain components, the contribution of plastic strain to total strain is important at all temperatures, particularly when the ice is close to its melting point. The contribution of primary creep strain is greater at the beginning of the loading process, and secondary creep eventually dominates as loading continues. The contribution of primary creep to permanent strain increases markedly as temperature decreases, whereas the contribution of secondary creep increases with temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialwissenschaft und WerkstofftechnikSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207