MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412744419 · doi:10.5014/ajot.2025.79s2-ca19

eHealth Can Restore Function: Cancer-Related Fatigue Management Pilot Study

2025· article· en· W4412744419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Fleischer, Caroline Frazee, C. Pickering, Emily Flohre, Samantha Wourms, Mary Insana Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordseHealthFunction (biology)MedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Date Presented 04/04/2025 The eHealth online intervention targeting cancer-related fatigue demonstrated a significant reduction in fatigue and improvement in quality of life and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure satisfaction scores. This provides preliminary support for using eHealth for treating cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Primary Author and Speaker: Anne Fleischer Additional Authors and Speakers: Mary Insala Fisher Contributing Authors: Caroline Frazee, Carrie Pickering, Emily Flohre, Samantha Wourms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicNutrition and Health in AgingFrench-language works237,207