MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412745169 · doi:10.2471/b09366

Green spaces – sectoral solutions for air pollution and health

2025· book· en· W4412745169 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Health Organization eBooks · 2025
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el DesarrolloUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New South WalesForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeUniversity of GhanaEuropean CommissionUniversidad del NorteColorado State UniversityUniversity of SurreyTrinity College DublinGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverGovernment of the United KingdomUniversity of WashingtonLeibniz-GemeinschaftNanyang Technological UniversityUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsAir pollutionPollutionEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningBusinessChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Green spaces -sectoral solutions for air pollution and health Technical brief Key messagesExposure to green spaces is widely associated with health benefits, including mental (e.g.reduced risk of depression and anxiety), physical (e.g.improved cardiovascular health), healthy behaviours (e.g.physical activity) and social health (e.g.reduced loneliness).These health benefits can result in major health sector cost savings.Additionally, health co-benefits of green spaces may arise from interventions aimed at improving air quality, which could partially explain the relationship between green spaces and health.Air pollution is a major environmental risk to health and urgent action is needed to reduce it.Lowering emissions at their source is the most effective strategy for reducing air pollution, but well-designed and biodiverse green spaces within communities may offer an additional policy option to improve air quality, helping to passively mitigate the impacts of harmful air pollutants and create healthier environments.However, the evidence remains limited and the effects of green spaces on reducing air pollution are variable and context dependent and may even be small or marginal depending on factors such as the type of green space, size, location, biodiversity and weather conditions.Vegetation impacts air quality both directly and indirectly and can have both positive and negative impacts on pollutant concentrations and characteristics depending on the design and setting.For example, air pollutants can be deposited on the surface of plants, and vegetation can decrease pollutant concentration, and act as a barrier to dispersion.Also, green spaces can reduce soil erosion, improve urban drainage and help prevent desertification and dust exposure.Nevertheless, unintended consequences may also occur.For example, increased concentration of pollutants due to the trapping effect (such as in street canyons -streets flanked by buildings on both sides creating a canyon-like environment), emission of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) that contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone, and pollen production can have a negative impact on air quality when green spaces are not properly designed and managed. Air Quality, Energy and Health Science and Policy SummariesGreen spaces -sectoral solutions for air pollution and health: Technical brief Priority actions for short-term health benefits include:• the use of properly designed and maintained vegetation in highly polluted areas to reduce exposure to air pollution and decrease the associated disease burden.However, this should be considered as part of a broader strategy including other interventions (e.g.reducing emissions, improving transport infrastructure to promote active mobility, and integrating green spaces with built infrastructure such as green walls and permeable surfaces) to provide more immediate and long-term health benefits.Priority actions for long-term health benefits include:• assessment, guidance and outreach on the role of green spaces in air pollution reduction from different vegetation types and green space design in varying contexts and climates.• plans for afforestation in arid lands that generate dust, considering the climatic conditions of the area and the most efficient and resistant vegetation in each case.Stakeholders from multiple sectors, including the health sector and academia, can play an important role in planning, designing, monitoring and evaluating green spaces to enhance their co-benefits. Key definitionsGreen spaces: Surfaces partially or completely covered by vegetation (e.g.grass, trees, shrubs, etc.).These include -but are not limited to -parks, gardens, street trees, forests and fields, which can be present in urban, suburban or rural areas (1, 2).Green infrastructure: Network of natural and semi-natural systems, such as green roofs or urban forests, that provide environmental, social and economic benefits by using nature-based solutions.It helps create healthier, more resilient urban environments (3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Health Organization eBooksSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207