MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412746171 · doi:10.2196/71703

Online Illicit Drug Distribution in the Thai Language on X: Exploratory Qualitative Content Analysis

2025· article· en· W4412746171 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François Lamy, Seung Chun Paek, Natthani Meemon

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Infodemiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintAdvertisingContent analysisIllicit drugExploratory researchQualitative analysisQualitative researchPsychologyDrugComputer scienceBusinessSociologyWorld Wide WebSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: By increasing exposure to drug-related advertisements, the illicit digital drug trade promotes drug normalization and eases access to substances, increasing the likelihood of initiation. Social media platforms play an increasingly important role in facilitating the online substance trade by leveraging encrypted communications and user-friendly interfaces to advertise a large variety of readily available substances. Despite its growing importance, there is a paucity of research conducted in Thailand that aims to determine the types of substances, marketing strategies, and public health risks linked to drugs advertised on social media. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to inductively explore the content of tweets on the social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) advertising drugs in the Thai language. METHODS: Tweets advertising psychoactive substances in the Thai language were collected manually between April and July 2024. A qualitative content analysis was performed on the collected tweets. Tweets were coded based on 5 themes: types of substances advertised, marketing strategies, delivery methods, number of substances per tweet, and location references. The intercoder reliability for each theme was assessed using Krippendorff α, achieving substantial agreement across most codes. RESULTS: A total of 3832 tweets advertising drugs were collected and analyzed. Most tweets (2424/3832, 63.26%) mentioned 5 or more substances, with depressants such as opioids (2807/3832, 73.25%), antihistamines (2394/3832, 62.47%), and benzodiazepines (2009/3832, 52.42%) being the most frequently advertised. Common marketing techniques included direct contact information (2848/3832, 74.32%) and fast delivery (1216/3832, 31.73%). Delivery methods primarily involved courier services but generally offered multiple options. Tweets that mentioned at least 1 sex-performance enhancer were frequently (422/543, 77.7%) advertised in combination with benzodiazepine. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest the presence of a large number of substances advertised for sale on the X platform in the Thai language. This digital form of drug trading is facilitated by possible direct messaging and the large number of courier services existing in Thailand. Our findings call for the development of real-time monitoring systems that harness drug-related data from social media to inform public health practitioners about emerging substances and trends and address the challenges posed by the digital drug trade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR InfodemiologySame topicPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingFrench-language works237,207