MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412748022 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3593868

Joint Superimposed Pilot-Aided Channel Estimation and Data Detection for FTN Signaling Over Doubly-Selective Channels

2025· article· en· W4412748022 on OpenAlexaff
Simin Keykhosravi, Ebrahim Bedeer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling and superimposed pilot (SP) are known techniques to improve the spectral efficiency (SE). This paper proposes an innovative SP-aided channel estimation method for FTN signaling over doubly-selective channels. We adopt a basis expansion model (BEM) to avoid complex channel tracking, and we propose a SP-aided frame structure that eliminates the overhead of multiplexed pilots (MPs). We additionally propose two detection methods: (1) an SP-aided separate channel estimation and data detection (SCEDD) method performing a single channel estimation followed by iterative data detection via a turbo equalizer, and (2) an SP-aided joint channel estimation and data detection (JCEDD) method, which extends the SCEDD by updating the channel estimate in each turbo equalization iteration. At equivalent SE and a high fading rate on the order of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$10^{-3}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, our simulations show that SP-aided SCEDD method outperforms MP-aided techniques in both the mean square error (MSE) and bit error rate (BER), while the SP-aided JCEDD method delivers remarkable performance, where reference approaches fail to track rapid channel variations. At a very low fading rate on the order of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$10^{-4}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, the SP-aided JCEDD algorithm enhances the MSE by over 6 dB and 2 dB compared to the MP-aided frequency domain equalization (FDE) and time domain equalization (TDE) methods, respectively. In terms of BER, the JCEDD provides over 3 dB enhancements compared to MP-aided FDE, while remaining competitive with MP-aided TDE, showing only less than 0.5 dB degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207