MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412750617 · doi:10.22187/rfd2022nesp1a5

Violencia obstétrica y acceso a la justicia: análisis desde una perspectiva de género

2022· article· es· W4412750617 on OpenAlex
Romina Gallardo Duarte, María De la Paz Echetto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la Facultad de Derecho · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Violence, Rights in Latin America
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGender violencePolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo nos proponemos analizar el reconocimiento normativo de la violencia obstétrica en el plano internacional y nacional, así como el efectivo acceso a la justicia para las mujeres víctimas de este tipo de violencia en Uruguay. Luego del estudio tres casos en proceso de denuncia o judicialización y de tres sentencias judiciales firmes, concluimos a modo de primera aproximación al tema, que si bien han existido importantes avances en el plano nacional para el reconocimiento normativo de la violencia obstétrica, es necesario introducir la perspectiva de género por parte de quienes reciben y juzgan este tipo de casos en el ámbito administrativo y judicial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it