A Multimodal MRI-Based Model for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Prediction: Integrating Radiomics, Deep Learning, and Clinical Features with SHAP Interpretation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Predicting colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is essential for prognostic assessment. This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable multimodal machine learning framework based on multiparametric MRI for predicting CRLM, and to enhance the clinical interpretability of the model through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis and deep learning visualization. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 463 patients with pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer from two institutions, divided into training (n = 256), internal testing (n = 111), and external validation (n = 96) sets. Radiomics features were extracted from manually segmented regions on axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Deep learning features were obtained from a pretrained ResNet101 network using the same MRI inputs. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression classifier was developed for clinical, radiomics, deep learning, and combined models. Model performance was evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. SHAP was used to assess feature contributions, and Grad-CAM was applied to visualize deep feature attention. Results: The combined model integrating features across the three modalities achieved the highest performance across all datasets, with AUCs of 0.889 (training), 0.838 (internal test), and 0.822 (external validation), outperforming single-modality models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed enhanced clinical net benefit from the integrated model, while calibration curves confirmed its good predictive consistency. SHAP analysis revealed that radiomic features related to T2WI texture (e.g., LargeDependenceLowGrayLevelEmphasis) and clinical biomarkers (e.g., CA19-9) were among the most predictive for CRLM. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed that the deep learning model focused on tumor regions consistent with radiological interpretation. Conclusions: This study presents a robust and interpretable multiparametric MRI-based model for noninvasively predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. By integrating handcrafted radiomics and deep learning features, and enhancing transparency through SHAP and Grad-CAM, the model provides both high predictive performance and clinically meaningful explanations. These findings highlight its potential value as a decision-support tool for individualized risk assessment and treatment planning in the management of colorectal cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".