Element Mobility in a Metasomatic System with IOCG Mineralization Metamorphosed at Granulite Facies: The Bondy Gneiss Complex, Grenville Province, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the absence of appropriate tools and a knowledge base for exploring high-grade metamorphic terrains, felsic gneiss complexes at granulite facies have long been considered barren and have remained undermapped and understudied. This was the case of the Bondy gneiss complex in the southwestern Grenville Province of Canada which consists of 1.39–1.35 Ga volcanic and plutonic rocks metamorphosed under granulite facies conditions at 1.19 Ga. Iron oxide–apatite and Cu-Ag-Au mineral occurrences occur among gneisses rich in biotite, cordierite, garnet, K-feldspar, orthopyroxene and/or sillimanite-rich gneisses, plagioclase-cordierite-orthopyroxene white gneisses, magnetite-garnet-rich gneisses, garnetites, hyperaluminous sillimanite-pyrite-quartz gneisses, phlogopite-sillimanite gneisses, and tourmalinites. Petrological and geochemical studies indicate that the precursors of these gneisses are altered volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks with attributes of pre-metamorphic Na, Ca-Fe, K-Fe, K, chloritic, argillic, phyllic, advanced argillic and skarn alteration. The nature of these hydrothermal rocks and the ore deposit model that best represents them are further investigated herein through lithogeochemistry. The lithofacies mineralized in Cu (±Au, Ag, Zn) are distinguished by the presence of garnet, magnetite and zircon, and exhibit pronounced enrichment in Fe, Mg, HREE and Zr relative to the least-altered rocks. In discrimination diagrams, the metamorphosed mineral system is demonstrated to exhibit the diagnostic attributes of, and is interpreted as, a metasomatic iron and alkali-calcic (MIAC) mineral system with iron oxide–apatite (IOA) and iron oxide copper–gold (IOCG) mineralization that evolves toward an epithermal cap. This contribution demonstrates that alteration facies diagnostic of MIAC systems and their IOCG and IOA mineralization remain diagnostic even after high-grade metamorphism. Exploration strategies can thus use the lithogeochemical footprint and the distribution and types of alteration facies observed as pathfinders for the facies-specific deposit types of MIAC systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".