A educação neoliberal e o processo de “fascistização” no Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo é compreender as relações de poder que permeiam as decisões e reformas políticas neoliberais no âmbito da educação e quais os propósitos da implantação dessas políticas, bem como, enriquecer e ampliar a discussão sobre o processo de fascistização no Brasil e seus desdobramentos nas políticas educacionais. Sabemos que o termo neoliberalismo é bastante amplo, no entanto salientamos aqui que o neoliberalismo neste trabalho se configura como uma “racionalidade do capital” sentido utilizado pelo sociólogo Christian Laval. Para entender sobre o processo de fascistização, buscou-se subsídios nos estudos do professor Gilberto Calil. Ademais, para refletirmos sobre relações de poder, ideologia e hegemonia nos embasamos em uma ampla bibliografia, incluindo dissertações, teses e livros de autores que trazem análises elaboradas e que fundamentam nossa reflexão.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".