The Cost of Expanding Ethiopia’s Salt Iodization Program to Include Multiple Micronutrients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: With near universal consumption of salt and technological advances that have made its fortification with multiple micronutrients feasible, salt has great potential for public health impact as a delivery vehicle for not only iodine but also multiple micronutrients. Decisions around modifying existing salt standards to include additional micronutrients should consider not only potential impacts but also stakeholder-specific costs. Objectives: We aimed to estimate the total and incremental cost of expanding Ethiopia's salt iodization program to include folic acid (dual fortified salt), folic acid and vitamin B-12 (triple fortified salt), or folic acid, vitamin B-12, and zinc (quadruple fortified salt). Methods: We developed activity-based cost models to estimate salt fortification costs over a 10-y time horizon (2024-2033). Model assumptions and parameters were primarily based on interviews with Ethiopian stakeholders in industry and government and nongovernmental partners. Results: The estimated annual average per capita cost of Ethiopia's existing salt iodization program was ∼$2.1 million (2021 US dollars) or ∼$7/metric ton (MT) of fortified salt (∼$0.02/y). Expanding the program to include folic acid, which could be sprayed onto salt along with the iodine, would increase the annual average per capita cost to ∼$2.5 million, or ∼$8.30/MT (∼$0.02/y). Annually, the costs of triple and quadruple fortified salt programs, which would require encapsulating the additional micronutrients as a solid premix to help ensure stability, were ∼$18 million (∼$59/MT; $0.13 per capita) and $19 million (∼$63/MT; ∼$0.14 per capita), respectively. Premix costs accounted for approximately half of the total cost of the iodized and dual fortified salt programs and ∼90% of triple and quadruple fortified salt. Conclusions: If Ethiopia considers modifying its existing salt iodization standard to include 1 or more additional micronutrients, there will be many important considerations, including costs and affordability. The cost estimates presented in this study can complement evidence of the potential for multiple fortified salt to reduce micronutrient deficiencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".