Automated Modal-Based FE Model Updating of a Medieval Masonry Tower Using Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masonry bell towers are a significant part of the historical assets of Italy, whose preservation against human-induced or natural risks is essential for decision-makers.These slender masonry structures are highly prone to vibrations from human activities, such as motor-vehicle traffic and construction operations, as well as from bell ringing and seismic excitations.Finite element models (FEM) are widely recognized as essential numerical tools for active structural health monitoring, enabling the analysis and simulation of complex structural behavior.The rapid development of new and continuous improvement of existing numerical modeling methods has increased the need for improved reliability and precision of models to predict structural responses and detect damage realistically.This study focuses on improving the accuracy of finite element models (FEM) for these vulnerable masonry structures using advanced updating techniques.Finite element model updating (FEMU), framed as a minimization problem, is the process of calibrating model parameters based on the actual dynamic properties of a structure obtained from operational modal analysis (OMA), such as natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping ratios.The purpose is to determine the optimal unknown parameters of the model, such as elastic moduli, mass densities, constraints, and boundary conditions, to minimize the objective function that quantifies the discrepancy between experimental and numerical modal properties.This research advances previous work on the medieval bell tower of San Giuseppe in Aci Castello, which relied on manual model updating through trial and error using experimental data.Here, manual FEM updating is replaced by nature-inspired optimization techniques to reinforce the accuracy and efficiency.The FEM of the bell tower, developed in OpenSeesPy, is calibrated employing Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to match natural frequencies and mode shapes obtained through OMA.The results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of both algorithms in automating the updating process and improving the model accuracy.This study not only increases FEM reliability but also provides insights for further methodological improvements in structural health monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".