MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412754731 · doi:10.11159/iccste25.363

Comfort Evaluation of the 'Católica' Pedestrian Bridge Based on SETRA 2006

2025· article· en· W4412754731 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lakshmi Prabha R, Nayeli Rios M., Mathias Bazalar C., Magdalena Mària Serrano

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianBridge (graph theory)Computer scienceTransport engineeringEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing trend toward slender and low-stiffness pedestrian bridge designs has significantly raised their susceptibility to dynamic excitations induced by pedestrian activity.One of the most critical vibration phenomena in such structures is synchronous excitation, which occurs when the walking frequency of pedestrians coincides with the natural frequency of the bridge.This resonance condition can amplify the structural response, negatively impacting both user comfort and overall structural performance.These challenges are particularly relevant in densely populated urban environments such as Lima.In this study, the dynamic behavior and comfort performance of the "Catlica" pedestrian bridge were evaluated through in-situ vibration measurements using a geophone-based seismograph.The recorded data were analyzed based on the SETRA guideline, which classifies comfort into four levels according to peak vertical acceleration.This international reference was selected because, unlike the Peruvian bridge design standards-which do not explicitly consider pedestrian-induced vibrations as a dynamic load-the SETRA guideline has been applied in similar studies within the national context and offers more specific criteria for evaluating pedestrian comfort.The results showed that vertical accelerations reached up to 0.541 g (5.31 m/s) during pedestrian activity, corresponding to the lowest comfort level defined by the SETRA guideline.While most structural frequencies remained outside the resonance range, certain transverse modes during loading approached 1.2 Hz-a value close to the typical walking frequency range of pedestrians (1.7-2.3Hz)suggesting a moderate potential for dynamic amplification.Although no clear resonance was detected, the elevated acceleration levels observed under normal use conditions highlight the need to implement vibration mitigation measures.At this stage of the study, no single solution is prescribed.However, there is a recognized need to evaluate and compare various mitigation strategies in order to determine the most appropriate approach.These may include Tuned Mass Dampers (TMDs), damping pads, tuned stiffness elements, or minor structural modifications.A comparative assessment considering technical performance, ease of implementation, and cost-effectiveness would help identify the optimal solution.Such measures would allow the bridge to comply with the SETRA Level 1 comfort threshold (0.5 m/s), thereby enhancing both safety and user comfort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207