Life Cycle Assessment of Cementitious Bricks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The construction sector heavily employs cementitious bricks due to their high durability and versatility.The entire manufacturing process of cementitious bricks and their utilization resulted in severe environmental impacts, including raw material exhaustion, the release of greenhouse gases, and the creation of waste products.This paper evaluates the sustainability implications of cementitious bricks using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method through their entire lifecycle, starting from material extraction and ending at disposal.The analysis showed that the production stage emerges as the most damaging phase because it leads to substantial resource depletion and emission release.The implementation of waste management offers environmental benefits by lowering individual hazards, but it simultaneously produces additional environmental difficulties.Furthermore, visual network diagrams demonstrate that the release of emissions from brick production leads to substantial climate-associated damage and health consequences.A possible sustainable method to overcome waste produced by cementitious bricks is to utilize Waste Tyre Rubber (WTR) as an alternative to the sand component.In summary, this research shows the necessity for improving processes of brick manufacturing, waste management, and ecological alternatives.The study strengthens the movement toward environmentally friendly building materials because it demonstrates their ability to preserve construction standards while decreasing environmental deterioration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".