Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Using FEMA P-154 and Welded Mesh Reinforcement in Informal Settlements in Peru
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the seismic vulnerability of 30 self-built houses in the Juan Pablo II human settlement in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru, which, due to their informal construction and the use of low-quality materials, present a high risk of seismic events; To do so, the FEMA-P154 methodology will be used, revealing that 31% have a risk of collapse greater than 50%.Likewise, the results of this research will allow us to identify the main structural deficiencies and propose appropriate reinforcement solutions, thus contributing to improving the safety of the inhabitants of the area and reducing human and material losses in the event of an earthquake.This study evaluates the alternative of welded mesh as a reinforcement proposal to improve the seismic behavior of the houses, which will be evaluated through dynamic and pushover analysis, using tools such as AutoCAD and Etabs to perform structural analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".