MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412754874 · doi:10.11159/iccste25.247

Slope Stability Analysis of the Slope Located On the E35 Pan-American Highway, Exit to Cuenca, Carigán Sector

2025· article· en· W4412754874 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jose Luis Chavez Torres, Kunyong Zhang, Dylan Manuel Cueva Castillo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeotechnical engineeringSlope stability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyses the stability of the slope located on the E35 Pan-American Highway, exit to Cuenca, Carigán sector, an area of importance for Ecuadorian road infrastructure.The research employed a quantitative methodology structured in systematic phases that included in situ evaluation, geotechnical zoning, topographic and geophysical survey, soil sampling, laboratory tests, hydrological studies, numerical modelling and profile analysis.The results showed safety factors of 0.41, 0.32, 1.21 and 0.95 for the different conditions evaluated, indicating instability in most of the scenarios analysed.The modelling showed that critical conditions such as the presence of a shallow water table, increased loading and seismic activity significantly reduce the factors of safety below the unit value established by the current regulations.It was determined that the composition of the soil, mainly clays and silts of high plasticity, contributes to the susceptibility of the slope to landslides, especially during periods of high rainfall.Sensitivity analyses revealed that the cohesion of the material and the angle of internal friction are determining parameters in the geomechanical behaviour of the slope.These findings suggest the need to implement mitigation measures such as drainage systems, equilibrium berms and retaining walls to guarantee the long-term stability of this important communication route and prevent potential landslides affecting the road infrastructure and the safety of users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207