MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412756388 · doi:10.7202/1118894ar

Les relations franco-libanaises : de l’héritage du mandat aux défis contemporains

2025· article· fr· W4412756388 on OpenAlex
Sara Zoghbi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnjeux et société Approches transdisciplinaires · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPolitical scienceHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette note de recherche explore les relations complexes entre le Liban et la France, depuis le mandat français de 1861 à 1943, jusqu’à aujourd’hui. Le mandat a profondément influencé les structures politiques, éducatives et culturelles libanaises, imposant la langue française. Cette influence a toutefois exacerbé les tensions entre les communautés religieuses du Liban. Depuis l’indépendance en 1943, les liens culturels et économiques franco-libanais ont persisté, malgré les crises actuelles. Le texte analyse comment le mandat français est perçu comme une forme de colonialisme persistant et examine l’impact de la langue et du système éducatif français sur l’identité libanaise. Basé sur des recherches d’archives, il offre une perspective nuancée sur les dynamiques de pouvoir et les tensions sociales, mettant en avant les défis d’émancipation identitaire et culturelle au Liban.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it