MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412759844 · doi:10.1142/s0219887825502871

Joint invariants of killing tensors and the Smorodinsky–Winternitz superintegrable potential

2025· article· en· W4412759844 on OpenAlexafffund
Roman G. Smirnov, Amelia Vargas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJoint (building)PhysicsPure mathematicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we provide a geometric characterization of the Smorodinsky–Winternitz (SW) superintegrable potential within the framework of the invariant theory of Killing tensors in spaces of constant curvature. Specifically, we employ two-fold joint invariants of Killing two-tensors in the Euclidean plane to highlight the properties of the SW potential and to elucidate the geometric significance of its arbitrary parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207