MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412774095 · doi:10.1111/modl.13020

Transepistemic language teacher education: A framework for plurilingualism, translanguaging, and challenging colonialingualism

2025· article· en· W4412774095 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Language Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranslanguagingPedagogyMathematics educationLinguisticsSociologyPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Languages shape worldviews, inform teacher values and behaviors, and are not disconnected from local political, sociocultural, and ecological contexts. For Indigenous peoples, language, land, and culture are inseparable. In contrast, English carries a human‐centered, colonial, imperialist, and assimilationist legacy that persists in language teacher education. With the unabated global spread of English, Indigenous and heritage languages—and their speakers—have been disenfranchised, minoritized, or subjected to genocide through cultural and linguistic imperialism and white epistemological supremacy. This article contends the human‐centered and imperialist worldview transmitted through English exemplifies colonialingualism. Colonialingualism upholds colonial legacies, imperial mindsets, and inequitable practices in both pre‐service and in‐service language teacher education. Examples include the dominance of Eurocentric or colonial languages, frameworks, methodologies, and approaches, as well as the marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies and pedagogies. Colonialingual classroom environments perpetuate narratives of epistemic and linguistic superiority, racism, assimilation, and further marginalize Indigenous, heritage, and minoritized language speakers. Moreover, language teacher education often neglects the relational connections between language and place‐based knowledges—crucial in confronting today's climate and humanitarian crises. To address this, I argue that an epistemic (un)learning of the “epistemological error” is required to enable critical reflection and equitable validation of all languages and knowledge systems, including those Indigenous and minoritized, in language teacher education. I illustrate how a biocultural heritage language pedagogy can support reflexivity and action‐oriented epistemic (un)learning, challenge colonialingualism, and foster place‐based transepistemic learning in the Canadian context. Transepistemic language education offers a complementary—not competing—framework to engage a contextual, decolonial, pluriversal sharing of languages and knowledges for more equitable language teacher education. As such, a colonialingual approach to language teacher education is offered to facilitate epistemic (un)learning processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it