MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412774799 · doi:10.1108/jrf-03-2025-0133

Crisis misread: the interplay of governance and financial literacy in Lebanon’s 2019 downfall

2025· article· en· W4412774799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Risk Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Children, Community and Social Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial literacyCorporate governanceFinancial systemFinancial crisisAccountingEconomicsPolitical scienceBusinessFinanceKeynesian economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This study aims to investigate the underlying factors that limited Lebanese citizens, despite their financial literacy, from effectively anticipating and responding to the 2019 economic crisis. By examining latent variables, the research explores the interplay between financial literacy and quality of governance in crisis management. Design/methodology/approach The research adopts a quantitative approach using an online survey targeting 258 Lebanese respondents with educational backgrounds in finance, business or economics. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify latent factors influencing individuals’ ability to anticipate and mitigate the crisis’s impact. Findings The study reveals two primary latent factors that significantly influenced consumer behavior: (1) economic and financial literacy and (2) quality of governance. While participants demonstrated reasonable financial literacy levels and recognized early warning signs, their ability to respond effectively was hindered by low-quality governance. Corruption, fiscal mismanagement and a lack of transparent economic data limited consumers' capacity to act on their financial literacy. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings are based on a sample of 258 respondents residing in Beirut, which may limit broader generalizability. Future research should expand the sample size and geographic coverage. Practical implications The research recommends enhancing governance frameworks through judicial independence, digital government platforms and public education campaigns on corruption to improve crisis resilience. Social implications Strengthening public trust in institutions through improved governance can foster greater civic engagement and encourage proactive financial behavior, enhancing societal resilience against economic crises. Originality/value This study contributes to the crisis management literature by demonstrating that financial literacy alone is insufficient for effective crisis mitigation. The findings highlight the critical role of governance in translating financial awareness into meaningful precautionary actions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it