Analisis Pengaruh Holding Time, Holding Pressure, dan Cooling Time Terhadap Nilai dan Konsistensi Lid Opening Force
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flip top cap tube merupakan tutup botol yang terdiri dari 2 bagian yaitu tutup dan topi, dibutuhkan gaya untuk melakukan gerakan membuka pada flip top cap tube yang disebut dengan lid opening force. Dalam mengatasi permasalahan rendahnya nilai lid opening force pada produk cap tube 35 mm, dilakukan penelitian pada parameter yang memiliki pengaruh terhadap nilai lid opening force yaitu tekanan tahan, waktu tahan, dan waktu pendinginan. Tekanan tahan yang diteliti memiliki nilai 25%, 30%, 35%, dan 40%. Waktu tahan dengan nilai 0,8 detik, 1 detik, 1,2 detik, dan 1,4 detik dan waktu pendinginan dengan nilai 11,5 detik dan 12,5 detik. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Taguchi dan ANOVA. Analisis dari hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa parameter tekanan tahan memberikan persentase kontribusi 72,42%, waktu pendinginan dengan persentase kontribusi 15,35%, dan waktu tahan dengan persentasi kontribusi 4,33%. Untuk mendapatkan nilai lid opening force terbaik dengan nilai 1,73 kgf, maka digunakan parameter setting tekanan tahan dengan nilai 40%, waktu tahan dengan nilai 1,4 detik, dan waktu pendinginan dengan nilai 12,5 detik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".