Arahan pengembangan Objek Daya Tarik Wisata Kebun Teh Jamus Kecamatan Sine Kabupaten Ngawi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objek Wisata Kebun Teh Jamus yang terletak di Kabupaten Ngawi, Jawa Timur, memiliki potensi besar sebagai destinasi wisata unggulan. Namun, beberapa masalah seperti pengelolaan yang belum optimal dan persaingan yang semakin ketat menghambat perkembangannya. Studi ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan arahan pengembangan objek wisata ini dengan menganalisis kondisi terkini, potensi, dan kendala yang ada. Studi ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan analisis Delphi dengan data yang dikumpulkan dari wisatawan, masyarakat sekitar, dan para ahli. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Kebun Teh Jamus memiliki daya tarik wisata alam yang kuat, terutama pemandangan kebun teh yang indah dan asri, serta wisata buatan seperti Sumber Lanang dan kolam renang. Namun, beberapa masalah perlu diperhatikan, seperti kebersihan atraksi, variasi makanan dan oleh-oleh, serta kualitas akses jalan. Temuan menunjukkan pentingnya perbaikan dan penambahan fasilitas, peningkatan kualitas sarana dan prasarana, perbaikan aksesibilitas, promosi yang lebih efektif, serta peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat terkait kebersihan. Intervensi terhadap hal-hal tersebut dapat mendorong Kebun Teh Jamus menjadi destinasi wisata yang lebih menarik, berkelanjutan, dan memberikan manfaat ekonomi bagi masyarakat sekitar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".