MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412780465 · doi:10.1353/cht.2025.a967066

Agnes, Aimée, Alice: Three Acadian Sisters as Exemplary Twentieth-Century American Catholic Women

2025· article· en· W4412780465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Colby Gaudet

Bibliographic record

VenueU.S. Catholic historian · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlice (programming language)ArtHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In the late nineteenth century, the industrial mill towns of New England drew several thousand francophone Catholic Acadian immigrants from Atlantic Canada. One such Acadian immigrant family—the Bourneufs—established themselves in the greater Boston area, and three daughters of the family became exemplary twentieth-century American Catholics. None of these women ever married and instead committed themselves to intellectual careers within a male-dominated professional world. Agnes Bourneuf wrote for periodicals such as Catholic Digest , and later owned and operated St. Thomas More, an ecumenical Catholic bookstore on the campus of Harvard University. Aimée Bourneuf became a religious sister of the Society of the Sacred Heart, taught French at Manhattanville College of the Sacred Heart in New York, and translated theological treatises during the Vatican II era. Alice Bourneuf studied at Radcliffe College, became a leading American economist, and established an influential career at Boston College. Using documentary evidence, including their respective publications, this article recovers their story.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueU.S. Catholic historianSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207