MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412782072 · doi:10.1002/jrs.70030

Maximizing Scientific Exploitation of Raman Spectroscopy With A.C.M.E. (Atmospheric Chamber for Measurements in Environment)

2025· article· en· W4412782072 on OpenAlexaff
Iván Reyes‐Rodríguez, Sofía Julve‐Gonzalez, Marco Veneranda, J. A. Manrique, A. Sanz‐Arranz, M. Mayoral‐Yagüe, S. Jiménez‐Blázquez, L. Asenjo‐Estévez, E. Charro, Jaime Delgado Iglesias, E.A. Lalla, Belen Barrios‐Areinamo, F. Rull, G. López-Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Social FundConsejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y LeónEuropean Commission
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceEnvironmental scienceChemistryEnvironmental chemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Atmospheric Chamber for Measurements in Environment (A.C.M.E.) provides a versatile and highly controlled environment for simulating planetary conditions, supporting the testing and calibration of instruments for planetary exploration. In this study, we utilized A.C.M.E. to evaluate the performance of a novel hollow‐core fiber (HCF) Raman gas sensor prototype developed by the ERICA research team. By integrating the HCF sensor with a dedicated spectrometer, we confirmed that Raman spectrometers, such as the Raman Laser Spectrometer (RLS), could be used for atmospheric gas analysis in future planetary missions, expanding their applications beyond mineralogical studies. By using the A.C.M.E. chamber to produce representative gas mixtures, this work analytically demonstrated that, once optimized, the HCF sensor prototype could be potentially used to investigate the atmosphere of both Mars and Venus in future planetary missions. These findings underscore the critical role of atmospheric chambers like A.C.M.E. in advancing technologies for future planetary exploration missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Raman SpectroscopySame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207