MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412784201 · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2025.105277

Electric versus diesel: Green supply chain network design with carbon footprint labeling

2025· article· en· W4412784201 on OpenAlexafffund
Ensieh Ghaedyheidary, Samir Elhedhli

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCarbon footprintDiesel fuelFootprintSupply chainAutomotive engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceTransport engineeringEnvironmental engineeringBusinessGreenhouse gasGeographyMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transportation electrification and carbon footprint labeling are strong indicators of environmental commitment in green supply chains. We study this framework and assess its environmental and financial sustainability. We consider cradle-to-gate operations, from manufacturing to retail, mandate the use of electric trucks whenever their range allows, and impose a cap on product carbon footprints as would be advertised on a carbon label. We optimize the locations of distribution centers, the allocation of demand, and the transportation choices between diesel trucks and electric trucks. We account for the nonlinear relationship between emissions and payload for diesel trucks, focus on two representative functional forms- concave and convex- and propose a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model to minimize costs and CO2-equivalent emissions. We use Lagrangean relaxation to decompose the model by echelon and isolate the convex and concave nonlinearity in an easy-to-solve subproblem. We then design a Lagrangean heuristic based on the solution of one of the subproblems, which has proven efficient and near-optimal. Based on a case study, we evaluate the impact of the emission function and the carbon label on the supply chain network, as well as the trade-off between the use of diesel trucks and electric trucks. We find that the relationship between emissions and payload for diesel trucks significantly influences the adoption of electric trucks. When concave, as would be the case for steady driving conditions, long hauls, well-maintained infrastructure, and light traffic, conventional diesel trucks continue to be the cost-efficient option, especially when electric truck mileage costs are high and the cap on unit emissions is elevated. In contrast, when diesel emissions are convex, corresponding to challenging driving conditions such as urban delivery, congested road networks, stop-and-go traffic, and degraded road infrastructure, transportation emissions dominate total emissions, diesel truck usage decreases, and electric trucks become a better choice even if the cap on unit emissions is high and diesel trucks are cheaper to operate. Furthermore, extending the range of electric trucks increases their usage under convex emissions but not under concave emissions, especially when the cap on carbon footprint is not tight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Part C Emerging TechnologiesSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207