Electric versus diesel: Green supply chain network design with carbon footprint labeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transportation electrification and carbon footprint labeling are strong indicators of environmental commitment in green supply chains. We study this framework and assess its environmental and financial sustainability. We consider cradle-to-gate operations, from manufacturing to retail, mandate the use of electric trucks whenever their range allows, and impose a cap on product carbon footprints as would be advertised on a carbon label. We optimize the locations of distribution centers, the allocation of demand, and the transportation choices between diesel trucks and electric trucks. We account for the nonlinear relationship between emissions and payload for diesel trucks, focus on two representative functional forms- concave and convex- and propose a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization model to minimize costs and CO2-equivalent emissions. We use Lagrangean relaxation to decompose the model by echelon and isolate the convex and concave nonlinearity in an easy-to-solve subproblem. We then design a Lagrangean heuristic based on the solution of one of the subproblems, which has proven efficient and near-optimal. Based on a case study, we evaluate the impact of the emission function and the carbon label on the supply chain network, as well as the trade-off between the use of diesel trucks and electric trucks. We find that the relationship between emissions and payload for diesel trucks significantly influences the adoption of electric trucks. When concave, as would be the case for steady driving conditions, long hauls, well-maintained infrastructure, and light traffic, conventional diesel trucks continue to be the cost-efficient option, especially when electric truck mileage costs are high and the cap on unit emissions is elevated. In contrast, when diesel emissions are convex, corresponding to challenging driving conditions such as urban delivery, congested road networks, stop-and-go traffic, and degraded road infrastructure, transportation emissions dominate total emissions, diesel truck usage decreases, and electric trucks become a better choice even if the cap on unit emissions is high and diesel trucks are cheaper to operate. Furthermore, extending the range of electric trucks increases their usage under convex emissions but not under concave emissions, especially when the cap on carbon footprint is not tight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".