Live imaging endogenous transcription factor dynamics reveals mechanisms of epiblast and primitive endoderm fate segregation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The segregation of the epiblast (EPI) and primitive endoderm (PE) cell types in the preimplantation mouse embryo is not only a crucial decision that sets aside the precursors of the embryo proper from extraembryonic cells, respectively, but also has served as a central model to study a key concept in mammalian development: how much of developmental patterning is predetermined vs. stochastically emergent. Here, we address this question by quantitative live imaging of multiple endogenously tagged transcription factors key to this fate decision and trace their dynamics at a single-cell resolution through the formation of EPI and PE cell fates. Strikingly, we reveal an initial symmetry breaking event, the formation of a primary EPI cell lineage, and show that this is linked to the dynamics of the prior inner cell mass/trophectoderm fate decision through the expression of SOX2. This primary EPI lineage, through fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling, induces an increase in the transcription factor GATA6 in other inner cell mass cells, setting them on the course toward PE differentiation. Interestingly, this trajectory can switch during a defined developmental window, leading to the emergence of secondary EPI cells. Finally, we show that early expression levels of NANOG, which are seemingly stochastic, can bias whether a cell's trajectory switches to secondary EPI or continues as PE. Our data give unique insight into how fate patterning is initiated and propagated during unperturbed embryonic development through the interplay of lineage-history-biased and stochastic cell-intrinsic molecular features, unifying previous models of EPI/PE segregation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".