The retina as a window into detecting subclinical cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are at high risk of subclinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), potentially detectable through retinal alterations. In this single-centre, prospective cohort study, 255 asymptomatic adults with T2D and no prior history of CVD underwent echocardiography, non-contrast coronary computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Retinal photographs were evaluated for diabetic retinopathy grade and microvascular geometric characteristics using deep learning (DL) tools. Associations with cardiac imaging markers of subclinical CVD were explored. Of the participants (aged 64 ± 7 years, 62% males); 200 (78%) had no diabetic retinopathy and 55 (22%) had mild background retinopathy. Groups were well-matched for age, sex, ethnicity, CV risk factors, urine microalbuminuria, and serum natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin levels. Presence of retinopathy was associated with a greater burden of coronary atherosclerosis (coronary artery calcium score ≥ 100; OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.29–5.36; P = 0.008), more concentric left ventricular remodelling (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.50–6.45; P = 0.002), and worse global longitudinal strain (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.18–4.59; P = 0.015), independent of key co-variables. Early diabetic retinopathy is associated with a high burden of coronary atherosclerosis and markers of early heart failure. Routine diabetic eye screening may serve as an effective alternative to currently advocated screening tests for detecting subclinical CVD in T2D, presenting opportunities for earlier detection and intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".