An interpretable CT-based machine learning model for predicting recurrence risk in stage II colorectal cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an interpretable 3-year disease-free survival risk prediction tool to stratify patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) by integrating CT images and clinicopathological factors. METHODS: A total of 769 patients with pathologically confirmed stage II CRC and disease-free survival (DFS) follow-up information were recruited from three medical centers and divided into training (n = 442), test (n = 190), and validation cohorts (n = 137). CT-based tumor radiomics features were extracted, selected, and used to calculate a Radscore. A combined model was developed using artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm, by integrating the Radscore with significant clinicoradiological factors to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), and feature contributions were qualified using the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) algorithm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed the prognostic stratification value of the risk groups. RESULTS: Fourteen radiomics features and five clinicoradiological factors were selected to construct the radiomics and clinicoradiological models, respectively. The combined model demonstrated optimal performance, with AUCs of 0.811 and 0.846 in the test and validation cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed effective patient stratification (p < 0.001) in both test and validation cohorts. A high Radscore, rough intestinal outer edge, and advanced age were identified as key prognostic risk factors using the SHAP. CONCLUSION: The combined model effectively stratified patients with stage II CRC into different prognostic risk groups, aiding clinical decision-making. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Integrating CT images with clinicopathological information can facilitate the identification of patients with stage II CRC who are most likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. KEY POINTS: The effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer remains debated. A combined model successfully identified high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients. Shapley additive explanations enhance the interpretability of the model's predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".