MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412798093 · doi:10.1097/dad.0000000000003087

Palisaded Neutrophilic and Granulomatous Dermatitis Associated With ASXL1-Mutated Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Case Report and Literature Review

2025· review· en· W4412798093 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Elsharawi, Ryan DeCoste, Natalie Cunningham, Tanya L. Gillan, Sylvia Pasternak

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of AgricultureNova Scotia HospitalUltra Electronics (Canada)Dalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaNeuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homologMedicineMyeloproliferative neoplasmPathologyRUNX1Myelodysplastic syndromesImmunologyBone marrowBiologyInternal medicineHaematopoiesisMyelofibrosisStem cellCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Palisaded neutrophilic and granulomatous dermatitis (PNGD) is a relatively rare histopathologic reaction pattern that has been associated with several underlying conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, connective tissue disorders, certain drugs, and hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). CMML shows features of a myeloproliferative neoplasm and myelodysplastic syndrome. The diagnosis can be supported by identifying an acquired clonal molecular abnormality, most commonly involving TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, RUNX1, NRAS , or CBL . Rare previous reports have highlighted the association between PNGD and SRSF2 -mutated CMML. In this study, we report the first known case of PNGD-associated ASXL1 -mutated CMML without a coexistent SRSF2 variant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of DermatopathologySame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207