Holistic swarm optimization: A novel metaphor-less algorithm guided by whole population information for addressing exploration-exploitation dilemma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel metaphor-less optimization algorithm called Holistic Swarm Optimization (HSO), designed to enhance the search process by utilizing data from the entire population. Unlike conventional algorithms that rely on partial or local information, HSO adopts a comprehensive approach, ensuring that each decision is informed by the overall distribution and fitness landscape of the population. The algorithm dynamically balances exploration and exploitation through an adaptive framework that integrates root-mean-squared (RMS) fitness-based displacement coefficients, simulated annealing-based selection, and adaptive mutation. This structure enables HSO to efficiently navigate complex, multimodal optimization problems while avoiding local optima. The performance of HSO is evaluated on two widely used benchmark test suites–CEC 2005 and CEC 2014–and a series of real-world engineering design problems. Results show that HSO delivers competitive and stable performance when compared to several state-of-the-art metaphor-based and metaphor-less algorithms. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of a holistic population-guided approach in achieving robust optimization outcomes, making HSO a promising alternative for solving diverse and challenging problems without reliance on metaphorical inspirations. The source codes and implementation guidance for the HSO algorithm are available for public access on the https://github.com/ebrahimakbary/HSO .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it