Constructing Accurate Potential Energy Surfaces with Limited High-Level Data Using Atom-Centered Potentials and Density Functional Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a general method for developing a Δ-DFT-type approach that enables the generation of energies with complete basis set CCSD(T)-level accuracy on the potential energy surfaces (PESs) of molecules of arbitrary size, while requiring only a minimal set (hundreds) of high-level wave function theory reference data points for fitting. The method uses a quasirandom (Sobol) approach to sample points on the PES for which reference data are generated. These data are then used to fit atom-centered potentials (ACPs) that improve the accuracy of the PES predicted by a density-functional theory method. The end result is an ACP-augmented DFT method capable of predicting the energies on the PES for the chosen molecule with approximately the same accuracy as the high-level reference method but at approximately the same cost as the DFT method. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated through its application to the HFCO and uracil molecules. For HFCO, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) using B3LYP/def2-TZVPP to predict the energies on the PES up to 40,000 cm –1 above the global minimum was reduced from 829.2 to 56.0 cm –1 with an ACP trained on as few as 272 CCSD(T)-F12/cc-pVTZ-F12 reference data points. For the more complex uracil molecule treated with B3LYP/6–311++G(2d,2p), the RMSE of the energies on the PES up to 7000 cm –1 above the global minimum was reduced from 82.6 to 9.9 cm –1 with an ACP trained on 404 data points. The quality of the ACP-corrected PESs obtained is further demonstrated by comparing the predicted fundamental vibrational frequencies relative to experimental spectroscopic data. The comparison shows that the approach generates CCSD(T)-quality data in the vicinity of PES minima at the cost of DFT, which can then be used in vibrational second-order perturbation theory calculations (equivalent to fitting a quartic force field). The new ACP-based protocol represents a promising tool for generating PES energy data with wavenumber accuracy relative to CCSD(T) for molecules of arbitrary size at minimal computational cost. These data can be used in computational quantum dynamics and spectroscopic studies and for the development of energy data sets required for analytical representations and/or machine learning models of PESs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".