Use of autologous common tunica vaginalis associated with polypropylene mesh in the treatment of perineal hernia in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris Linnaeus, 1758)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this report was to describe a case of unilateral perineal hernia in a dog treated with autologous common tunica vaginalis combined with polypropylene surgical mesh. An elderly, intact male Poodle with a history of swelling in the right perineal region was presented for treatment. Clinical and ultrasound examinations revealed a muscular defect, leading to a presumptive diagnosis of perineal hernia and benign prostatic hyperplasia. The treatment involved the implantation of a polypropylene mesh covered with autologous common tunica vaginalis at the site of the muscular defect, combined with orchiectomy and ductal deferentopexy. The patient demonstrated satisfactory clinical progress, with no complications observed during the clinical or surgical follow-up. In conclusion, the use of autologous common tunica vaginalis combined with polypropylene surgical mesh proved to be an effective treatment for unilateral dorsal perineal hernia in an elderly Poodle, with an 11-month follow-up period confirming its success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".