MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412803318 · doi:10.1109/pn66844.2025.11097118

Towards Compact and Sensitive THz Detection by Plasmonic-Enhanced Electro-Optic Sampling

2025· article· en· W4412803318 on OpenAlexaff
Hesam Heydarian, Xitong Xie, Aswin Vishnu Radhan, Wei Cui, Arnaud Weck, Angela Gamouras, Jean-Michel Ménard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationPlasmonOptoelectronicsSampling (signal processing)Materials scienceTerahertz metamaterialsOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsDetectorFar-infrared laser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a sensitive surface plasmon-enhanced THz detector in a standard free space electro-optic sampling (EOS) detection scheme. The plasmonic bull"s-eye antenna enhances the THz field by collecting and confining the incoming THz beam within the sub-wavelength region and reradiates it in the transmission side with negligible beam divergence to satisfy efficient spatial overlap with a NIR gating beam inside a second order nonlinear crystal. The optimized design is achieved numerically and fabricated with the femtosecond laser direct writing method as a reliable and scalable technique. The broad spectral band detection observed from 1.4 THz to 3.1 THz with up to 3.1 times enhancement in sensitivity at the plasmonic resonance frequency. This device effectively measures THz signals affected by beam wandering or varying spot sizes, paving the way for compact, sensitive THz detectors for wireless communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207